Originals

ℹ️Information

The Unique Insights of Adam Grant's "Originals": How Non-Conformists Move the World

Adam Grant's groundbreaking book "Originals: How Non-Conformists Move the World" challenges conventional wisdom about creativity, innovation, and what it takes to drive meaningful change. Through extensive research and compelling case studies, Grant reveals counterintuitive insights that fundamentally reshape our understanding of originality and how it emerges in both individuals and organizations.

The Counterintuitive Nature of Originality

Grant's most profound contribution lies in debunking widespread myths about original thinkers. His research reveals that originals are not the fearless risk-takers we imagine them to be. ^[0b5c3e] ^[787632] Instead, they are careful strategists who manage risk rather than embrace it recklessly. This finding challenges the popular narrative of the daredevil entrepreneur who bets everything on a single idea. ^[984195] ^[1b34df]

The book demonstrates that successful originals share four surprising characteristics that contradict popular assumptions: they are risk-averse rather than risk-seeking, they feel doubt and fear like everyone else, they generate many bad ideas alongside good ones, and they are often slow to act rather than quick first-movers. ^[69a95f] These insights fundamentally reframe how we think about innovation and creative leadership.

Procrastination as a Creative Force

One of Grant's most surprising discoveries concerns the relationship between procrastination and creativity. His research shows that moderate procrastination can boost creativity by 16%. ^[89dc53] ^[d8ff86] This finding challenges the conventional wisdom that procrastination is always detrimental to performance and productivity.

Grant illustrates this concept through powerful historical examples. Leonardo da Vinci took 16 years to complete the Mona Lisa, frequently setting it aside to pursue other interests like optics, which ultimately made him a better painter. ^[d8ff86] ^[c94515] Similarly, Martin Luther King Jr.'s most famous phrase, "I have a dream," was not in his prepared speech but was improvised on the spot after being encouraged by someone in the audience. ^[607c40] ^[c94515] The mechanism behind this phenomenon involves incubation - the mental process that allows ideas to develop and mature over time. Procrastination provides space for divergent thinking, enabling individuals to make unexpected connections and approach problems from novel angles. ^[89dc53] ^[59fc6f] However, Grant emphasizes that this applies specifically to moderate procrastination, not extreme delays that lead to panic and rushed work.

The Volume-Quality Connection

Grant reveals a fundamental truth about creativity: quantity is the most predictable path to quality. ^[5c153e] ^[f8df25] This insight directly contradicts the popular belief that creators should focus on perfecting a few ideas rather than generating many. His research shows that even creative geniuses cannot reliably predict which of their ideas will succeed.

The evidence is compelling: Thomas Edison filed over 1,100 patents, Mozart composed more than 600 pieces, and Picasso created over 15,000 works of art. ^[5c153e] ^[f8df25] These prolific creators are remembered for their masterpieces, but their success came from producing vast quantities of work, understanding that most ideas would not achieve lasting impact.

Grant explains that the biggest barrier to originality is not idea generation—it's idea selection. ^[5c153e] ^[92e28c] People struggle to identify which of their ideas will resonate with others, making it essential to create multiple options to increase the odds of success. This principle applies across fields, from scientific research to business innovation.

First-Mover Disadvantage

Perhaps one of Grant's most counterintuitive insights concerns the myth of first-mover advantage. His research demonstrates that pioneers face a 47% failure rate compared to only 8% for "improvers" who enter markets later. ^[1b34df] ^[e91d55] This finding challenges the Silicon Valley mantra that being first to market is crucial for success.

The book provides compelling examples of this principle in action. Google was not the first search engine (AltaVista and Yahoo preceded it), Facebook was not the first social network (Friendster and MySpace came first), and Apple was not the first to create smartphones (BlackBerry held that distinction). ^[e91d55] ^[deed29] These companies succeeded by learning from early pioneers' mistakes and improving upon existing concepts.

Grant identifies three key reasons why first-movers often fail: they frequently overstep by being too ambitious too early, they bear the cost of educating the market about new concepts, and they lack the advantage of learning from others' mistakes. ^[38f166] ^[deed29] Improvers benefit from better timing, reduced market education costs, and the ability to refine products based on pioneer feedback. ^[117489] ^[deed29]

Risk Management vs Risk-Taking

Grant's research reveals that successful originals are strategic risk managers rather than reckless risk-takers. ^[f1b613] ^[38f166] This insight challenges the stereotype of the all-or-nothing entrepreneur who quits their day job to pursue their passion. Instead, many successful founders maintain stability in some areas of their lives while taking calculated risks in others.

The data supports this approach: entrepreneurs who keep their day jobs while building their companies are 33% less likely to fail. ^[f1b613] ^[69a95f] The Warby Parker founders, despite Grant's initial skepticism, exemplified this principle by maintaining backup plans and internships while developing their revolutionary eyewear business. ^[0b5c3e] ^[31b435]

Grant describes this as managing risk like a stock portfolio - if you invest in high-risk ventures, you balance them with safer investments. ^[117489] This approach allows originals to pursue innovative ideas without jeopardizing their overall security and well-being.

The Psychology of Original Thinking

Grant introduces the concept of "vuja de" - the opposite of déjà vu, where familiar situations are seen with fresh eyes. ^[fee8f0] ^[d43846] This psychological phenomenon underlies much original thinking, as it involves questioning defaults and assumptions that others take for granted. Grant shows that people who choose non-default options (like downloading Chrome instead of using Safari) perform 19% better in their jobs. ^[787632] ^[07fffc]

The book also explores the power of defensive pessimism versus strategic optimism. [^9b08b4] ^[670d8d] While conventional wisdom suggests that positive thinking leads to better outcomes, Grant's research shows that defensive pessimists - those who imagine worst-case scenarios - often outperform optimists in certain situations. Defensive pessimists convert anxiety into motivation, leading to better preparation and ultimately superior performance. ^[03aac5] ^[988dbd]

Organizational Culture and Dissent

Grant reveals critical insights about how organizations can foster or stifle originality. One key finding concerns the difference between authentic dissent and appointed devil's advocates. ^[5b626b] ^[444d45] While many organizations assign devil's advocates to encourage diverse thinking, Grant's research shows that authentic dissent - genuine disagreement from committed individuals - is far more effective at generating innovative solutions.

The book highlights Ray Dalio's Bridgewater Associates as an example of authentic dissent culture, where employees are required to voice disagreements, even with senior leadership. ^[b0bca7] ^[38f166] This approach, while uncomfortable, leads to better decision-making and prevents the groupthink that destroys many organizations. ^[730279] ^[5f9af3]

Grant also emphasizes the importance of minority viewpoints, even when they are wrong, because they encourage divergent thinking and prevent organizations from becoming trapped in conventional wisdom. ^[38f166] ^[79dd74] The key is creating psychological safety where people feel comfortable expressing dissenting opinions without fear of retaliation.

Communication Strategies for Original Ideas

The book provides practical insights for communicating original ideas effectively. Grant introduces the concept of the "tempered radical" - someone who presents extreme ideas by couching them in conventional terms. ^[e255f5] ^[974fcc] This approach appeals to existing values rather than attempting to change people's fundamental beliefs.

Grant also reveals the counterintuitive power of leading with weaknesses when pitching ideas. ^[38f166] ^[f76f55] By acknowledging potential problems upfront, presenters appear more trustworthy and credible, making audiences more receptive to their proposals. This approach worked for entrepreneurs like Rufus Griscom, who successfully pitched his startup by highlighting reasons investors shouldn't fund it. ^[f76f55]

The book emphasizes the importance of familiarity in communication. ^[38f166] New ideas require 10-20 exposures before people become comfortable with them, making repetition and persistence crucial for original thinkers seeking to gain support for their innovations. ^[730279]

Fostering Originality

Grant provides evidence-based insights for parents, educators, and leaders seeking to nurture originality in others. His research shows that involvement in the arts increases the likelihood of winning Nobel Prizes by 12-22 times, ^[787632] suggesting that broad creative experiences enhance innovative thinking across domains.

The book reveals that birth order influences openness to new ideas, with later-born children more likely to challenge conventional thinking. ^[38f166] ^[c847d9] However, Grant emphasizes that originality is not determined by birth order or other fixed traits - it is a choice that can be developed and strengthened over time. ^[984195] ^[3249b2]

For organizations, Grant recommends creating cultures that welcome dissent, encourage diverse perspectives, and provide psychological safety for employees to voice unconventional ideas. ^[5f9af3] ^[f76f55] This includes avoiding the common mistake of demanding that people bring solutions rather than problems, which can prevent important issues from being raised. ^[5f9af3]

Conclusion

Adam Grant's "Originals" fundamentally challenges how we think about creativity, innovation, and change. The book's unique insights reveal that originality is not about being fearless or first, but about being thoughtful, persistent, and strategic. Grant shows that anyone can become more original by understanding these counterintuitive principles and applying them in their personal and professional lives.

The most powerful insight from Grant's work is that originality is a choice, not a trait. ^[984195] ^[3249b2] By debunking myths about creative genius and revealing the actual behaviors and strategies of successful originals, the book empowers readers to develop their own capacity for innovative thinking and meaningful impact.

These insights have profound implications for how we approach education, business, and social change. Rather than celebrating the lone genius or the fearless risk-taker, we should focus on creating environments that support thoughtful experimentation, diverse perspectives, and the patient development of ideas over time. In doing so, we can unlock the original potential that exists within individuals and organizations everywhere.