Domain-Driven Design

https://youtu.be/VGhg6Tfxb60?si=QdNIbMmxgw2jaAra
https://youtu.be/VGhg6Tfxb60?si=hm4Dyz3kq_CvuFer
https://youtu.be/g0047beVND4?si=u6D_QG_rVQ5o7NPf
Domain-Driven Design (DDD) is an approach to software development that centers the project around the core domain and its business logic. It aims to create software that aligns deeply with the complex business processes and models of a specific domain, making it easier to understand, maintain, and evolve over time.
Key principles of DDD include:
  1. Ubiquitous Language: This refers to a common language shared by all team members (developers, domain experts, stakeholders) to describe the domain, reducing misunderstandings and increasing efficiency.
  2. Bounded Contexts: These are clearly defined boundaries within which a particular model applies. They help manage complexity by separating different areas of concern.
  3. Entities, Value Objects, Aggregates: DDD introduces these concepts to represent real-world objects and their relationships in the system. Entities have a unique identity, while value objects do not. An aggregate is a cluster of domain objects that can be treated as a single unit for the purpose of data changes and consistency checks.
  4. Domain Events: These are significant changes or states within the domain that may trigger actions in other parts of the system. They help in modeling business processes more accurately.
  5. Repositories and Services: Repositories handle persistence concerns, while services encapsulate complex operations that don't naturally fit into entities or value objects.
Compared to other software development paradigms, DDD stands out for its emphasis on understanding and modeling the business domain in depth:
  1. Object-Oriented Programming (OOP): While OOP is a fundamental part of DDD, it goes beyond basic object modeling by focusing heavily on understanding the business domain and creating models that mirror real-world concepts closely.
  2. Traditional Layered Architecture (e.g., Presentation, Business Logic, Data Access Layers): These architectures often separate concerns into distinct layers but may not always reflect the complexities of a specific domain as effectively as DDD.
  3. Microservices: While microservices focus on breaking down an application into small, loosely coupled services, DDD focuses more on understanding and modeling the business domain itself, which can then be implemented using various architectural styles including microservices.
In essence, DDD is not a replacement for these paradigms but rather a complementary approach that emphasizes deep domain understanding as a key driver of software design and structure.